Quality of Life Improvements in People with MS Under Physical Activity Guidelines
A meta-analysis of 19 studies involving 891 people with MS showed significant improvements in overall quality of life, physical quality of life, and mental quality of life following recommended physical activity guidelines.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
- Human efficacy
- Not established from this source
- Mechanism
- Not reported
- Evidence strength
- Not graded
- Outcome
- Not reported
Why it matters
These findings suggest that adhering to physical activity guidelines may enhance the quality of life for individuals with MS, which is critical for their overall well-being.
What this does not prove
Most studies in the analysis were rated to have a high risk of bias, indicating potential issues with study quality.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Not reported
- Participants / samples
- 891 · Nineteen studies including 891 people with MS were identified.
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-04-13
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
- Biological target
- Not reported
- Pathway
- Not reported
- Population
- Not reported
- Size of effect
- Not reported
- Secondary endpoints
- Not reported
- MRI endpoints
- Not reported
- Biomarkers
- Not reported
- Safety
- Not reported
Original sources
- Primary evidenceImpact of Physical Activity Guidelines on Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. ↗DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2025-057
Supporting passages (9)
sample size891
sample size basisNineteen studies including 891 people with MS were identified.
publication date2026-04-13
interventionRecent research has suggested stronger physical activity guidelines for people with MS (PAG-MS).
primary endpointQuality of Life
findingsMeta-analysis revealed significant increases in overall QOL (standardized mean difference [MD], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.40-1.86; P < .01) as well as physical (MD, 12.84; 95% CI, 5.29-20.39; P < .01) and mental (MD, 16.75; 95% CI, 11.9-21.59; P = .04) subscale scores.
limitationsThe majority of studies were rated to have a high risk of bias.
peer reviewedPublication types: Journal Article; Review
subjectsRESULTS: Nineteen studies including 891 people with MS were identified.
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.