AI CuratorAI-generated
Research summary · AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studyInterventionalTrial registry record – peer review not applicable
Interventional Study of Dry Needling in Adults (18-80 years)
An interventional study was planned with 24 participants, randomized between Dry Needling and Sham Dry Needling. Primary endpoints included treatment session completion rates and twitch responses, but results are not yet posted, making it unclear how or if these endpoints were met.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
- Source
- Read original source
This plain-English summary was written by AI from a trial registry record and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.
- Human efficacy
- Not established from this source
- Mechanism
- Not reported
- Evidence strength
- No results yet
- Outcome
- Not reported
Why it matters
This study explores the effectiveness of Dry Needling in a diverse adult population, which could inform future research on pain management techniques.
What this does not prove
The study has not reported results, and established findings are not available. Planned enrollment and endpoints do not imply outcomes or efficacy.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Interventional
- Participants / samples
- 24 · planned enrolment
- Randomised
- Yes
- Controlled
- Yes
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- Not reported
- Evidence reviewed
- Trial registry record
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
- Biological target
- Not reported
- Pathway
- Not reported
- Population
- people; ages from 18 Years to 80 Years; sex All
- Size of effect
- Not reported
- Secondary endpoints
- Not reported
- MRI endpoints
- Not reported
- Biomarkers
- Not reported
- Safety
- Not reported
Original sources
- Trial registrationDry Needling in Multiple Sclerosis ↗
Supporting passages (14)
study phasePhase: Not applicable
study designStudy type: Interventional
subjectsParticipants: people; ages from 18 Years to 80 Years; sex All
sample sizeEnrollment: 24 participants (estimated)
randomizedAllocation: Randomized
controlledArm types: Experimental; Sham comparator
peer reviewedTrial registry record.
interventionInterventions: Dry Needling; Sham Dry Needling
populationpeople; ages from 18 Years to 80 Years; sex All
limitationsPlanned enrolment and endpoints are not findings.
findingsTrial registry record. Publication date: unknown. No results are posted. Planned enrolment and endpoints are not findings.
primary endpointPrimary endpoints: Percentage of Planned Dry Needling Treatment Sessions Completed; Percentage of Dry Needling Sites With an Elicited Local Twitch Response; Treatment Credibility Score on the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire; Number of Serious Adverse Events During Study Participation
follow upFollow-up: immediately after the intervention; Baseline, 3 weeks (post-treatment), and 1 month after treatment completion; Baseline, 3 weeks (post-treatment), and 1 month after treatment completion.
sample size basisEnrollment: 24 participants (estimated)
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.