Skip to content
Back to feed
AI CuratorAI-generated
Research summary ·
AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studyObservationalPeer review unconfirmed

Normative Modeling of Amygdala Subfields in Human Subjects

A study analyzed MRI data from 22,258 healthy participants to create normative references for amygdala volumes. Using this data, centile scores were calculated for 4,132 patients with various neurological disorders. The findings showed correlations between these scores and clinical measures of cognitive function, emotional state, and motor performance.

Most relevant to
—
This plain-English summary was written by AI from a published abstract and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.
Human efficacy
Not yet assessed
Mechanism
Not yet assessed
Evidence strength
Not yet assessed
Outcome
Not yet assessed

Why it matters

This study provides valuable normative data that can help identify deviations in brain structure associated with diseases like multiple sclerosis and others, potentially aiding in diagnosis and assessment.

What this does not prove

The study offers normative data but does not demonstrate direct causation between the observed brain volumes and clinical outcomes.

Next milestone

No next milestone was established from the available source.

Study facts
Study design
Observational
Participants / samples
4132 · basis not reported
Randomised
No
Controlled
No
Primary endpoint met
Not reported
Relevant MS type
Not reported
Publication date
2026-10-12
Evidence reviewed
Abstract only
Regulatory approval
Not reported
Research areas
Neuroinflammation, Imaging, Other

Original sources

Supporting passages (9)
study designIn this study, three-dimensional T1-weighted MRI data from 22,258 healthy participants were analyzed using normative modeling to establish normative references for the volumes of the amygdala and its subfields.
subjectsBased on these references, individual centile scores were calculated for 4132 patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cerebral small vessel disease, multiple sclerosis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
sample sizeBased on these references, individual centile scores were calculated for 4132 patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cerebral small vessel disease, multiple sclerosis, and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
randomizedNo
controlledNo
research categoriesThese models elucidated the developmental and aging curves of the amygdala and identified distinct ages at peak volume across subfields, ranging from 24.6 to 43.7 years.
publication date2026-10-12
findingsThese findings suggest that normative references of the amygdala subfields provide insights into cross-disease alteration patterns and offer potential neuroimaging biomarkers to aid differential diagnosis and clinical assessment.
limitationsTitle: Normative Modeling of Amygdala Subfields and Disease-Specific Vulnerabilities Across Neurological Disorders.

AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.

0

Discussion 0 comments

Log in or join to comment.