AI CuratorAI-generated
Research summary · AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studyInterventionalTrial registry
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in Multiple Sclerosis
A study with an estimated sample size of 40 people with Multiple Sclerosis aimed to compare the effects of High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) over 8 weeks, focusing on gait, balance, cognitive functions, and biomarkers. No results have been posted yet.
- Tags
- #Rehabilitation
- Most relevant to
- —
- Source
- Read original source
This plain-English summary was written by AI from a published abstract and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.
Why it matters
Understanding the effects of different training methods could help improve rehabilitation strategies for people with Multiple Sclerosis.
What this does not prove
The study has not posted results, and the planned enrollment and endpoints do not represent findings.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Interventional
- Participants / samples
- 40 · ESTIMATED
- Randomised
- Yes
- Controlled
- Yes
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- All
- Publication date
- Not reported
- Evidence reviewed
- Trial registry record
- Regulatory approval
- No
- Research areas
- Rehabilitation
Original sources
Supporting passages (16)
study design"studyType": "INTERVENTIONAL"
subjects"eligibilityCriteria": "Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis by a neurologist (Hacettepe University Hospitals, Neurology Outpatient Clinic)\n* Age 18 years and older\n* EDSS score between 0 and 4\n* Score of 24 or above on the Standardized Mini Mental State Examination\n* No relapse in the past 3 months\n* Medically stable for at least 6 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n• Any additional cardiopulmonary, neurological, or systemic disease other than MS",
sample size"count": 40
sample size basis"type": "ESTIMATED"
randomized"allocation": "RANDOMIZED"
controlled"interventionModel": "PARALLEL"
peer reviewed"isFdaRegulatedDrug": false
regulatory approval"isFdaRegulatedDevice": false
research categories"briefSummary": "This study aims to comparatively investigate the effects of low-volume High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on gait, balance, cognitive functions, and neurovascular biomarkers (BDNF, VEGF) in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
relevant ms types"eligibilityCriteria": "Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis by a neurologist (Hacettepe University Hospitals, Neurology Outpatient Clinic)\n* Age 18 years and older\n* EDSS score between 0 and 4\n* Score of 24 or above on the Standardized Mini Mental State Examination\n* No relapse in the past 3 months\n* Medically stable for at least 6 months\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n• Any additional cardiopulmonary, neurological, or systemic disease other than MS",
intervention"name": "High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)"
comparator"name": "Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT)"
primary endpoint"measure": "Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)"
follow up"timeFrame": "Baseline and 8 weeks"
findings"briefSummary": "This study aims to comparatively investigate the effects of low-volume High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training (MICT) on gait, balance, cognitive functions, and neurovascular biomarkers (BDNF, VEGF) in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
limitationsPlanned enrolment and endpoints are not findings.
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.