Survey on Internet Use for MS Information Among Participants
An online survey involving 152 MS participants highlighted that 99% used the Internet to seek MS-related information, with 84% searching for medicine specifics. MS specialists were the most trusted source, but 54.4% had concerns regarding the quality of online information.
- Most relevant to
- Neurologist, Immunologist
Why it matters
This study underscores the importance of reliable online information for individuals with MS, indicating a significant reliance on the Internet for health-related inquiries.
What this does not prove
Findings are exploratory and drawn from a specific charity's engaged members, lacking a calculable response rate. They require validation in broader, more representative samples.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Observational
- Participants / samples
- 152 · Number of participants who completed the survey.
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-09-09
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
Original sources
- Primary evidenceTrust and Health Information Seeking in MS ↗
Supporting passages (6)
study designMethods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed via the MS Trust to adults with MS or their carers in the United Kingdom.
sample sizeOne hundred and fifty-two participants completed the survey.
sample size basisResults: One hundred and fifty-two participants completed the survey.
publication datePublication date: 2026-09-09
findingsConclusions: Despite high engagement with online information, people with MS remain uncertain about its quality and find independent assessment time-consuming and complex.
limitationsBecause several preference items were answered by small subgroups (n = 35-79) drawn from an engaged charity membership, these findings are exploratory and require confirmation in more representative samples.
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.