Antonyms Task in MS Patients
In a study with 660 patients, the Antonyms task was found to have good test-retest reliability (0.85) and better criterion validity compared to traditional language tasks in assessing word-finding difficulties in MS patients.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
Why it matters
These findings suggest that the Antonyms task may be a more effective way to evaluate expressive language difficulties specifically reported by patients, which is important for both assessment and understanding of MS symptoms.
What this does not prove
The study lacks validation through peer-reviewed processes, which limits the reliability of its findings.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Not reported
- Participants / samples
- 660 · basis not reported
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-09-22
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
Original sources
- Primary evidenceAntonyms: A Performance Metric to Assess Word-Finding Difficulty in Multiple Sclerosis. ↗DOI: 10.64898/2026.09.21.26363587
Supporting passages (7)
sample size660
publication date2026-09-22
interventionTitle: Antonyms: A Performance Metric to Assess Word-Finding Difficulty in Multiple Sclerosis.
comparatortraditional language tasks
primary endpointThe Antonyms task is provided herein.
findingsAmong 660 patients, Antonyms demonstrated better criterion validity than traditional language tasks (e.g., animal generation, Boston Naming Test).
limitationsTitle: Antonyms: A Performance Metric to Assess Word-Finding Difficulty in Multiple Sclerosis.
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.