Economic Impact of Luja™ Catheter Utilizing Micro-hole Zone Technology in MS Patients
Adoption of the Luja™ catheter in MS patients reportedly reduced expenditures from € 1,039.2 million to € 1,033.1 million, leading to the prevention of 18,139 urinary tract infections (UTIs). Overall, the model suggests around 47,000 avoided UTIs and savings of € 15.8 million.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
Why it matters
This study highlights potential economic benefits from using the Luja™ catheter in MS patients, emphasizing cost savings and reduced UTIs, which are important for patient quality of life and healthcare budgets.
What this does not prove
The findings are based on indirect estimates and require confirmation through comparative real-world evidence, as they lack direct evaluation of the catheter's effectiveness.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Not reported
- Participants / samples
- 105200 · basis not reported
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-10-07
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
Original sources
- Primary evidence[Not Available]. ↗DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2026.3943
Supporting passages (7)
subjectseligible population included 64,600 users with SCI and 40,600 with MS.
sample sizeThe eligible population included 64,600 users with SCI and 40,600 with MS.
interventionMicro-hole Zone Technology (MhZT), implemented in the Luja™ catheter, is designed to support bladder emptying.
findingsIn patients with MS, expenditure decreased from € 1,039.2 million to € 1,033.1 million, preventing 18,139 UTIs.
findingsOverall, the model estimated approximately 47,000 avoided UTIs and € 15.8 million in related savings.
limitationsResults are mainly driven by an indirectly estimated reduction in UTIs and should be confirmed using comparative real-world evidence.
publication datePublication date: 2026-10-07
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.