Human perceptions of fundamental care needs in neurorehabilitation
In a study of neurorehabilitation patients with conditions like stroke, MS, or Parkinson's, participants expressed the importance of hygiene, mobility, and comfort to their dignity and recovery. They indicated that respectful communication and emotional support contributed to feelings of trust and agency.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
- Human efficacy
- Not yet assessed
- Mechanism
- Not yet assessed
- Evidence strength
- Not yet assessed
- Outcome
- Not yet assessed
Why it matters
These insights highlight the fundamental elements of care that patients perceive as vital for emotional safety and recovery during neurorehabilitation, informing future patient-centered approaches.
What this does not prove
The study does not establish causal relationships regarding care needs and is based on qualitative data, which may not be generalizable beyond the specific setting.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Not reported
- Participants / samples
- Not reported
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-10-15
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
Original sources
- Primary evidenceHow do neurorehabilitation patients perceive their fundamental care needs? Findings from a qualitative study. ↗DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.70236
Supporting passages (4)
subjectsPARTICIPANTS: We recruited individuals aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of stroke, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson disease, or who had undergone neurosurgical intervention for oncological conditions.
findingsThe analysis identified care experiences across the three FoC dimensions.
publication datePublication date: 2026-10-15
limitationsTitle: How do neurorehabilitation patients perceive their fundamental care needs? Findings from a qualitative study.
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.