HLA-DRB1*04:05 in EBV-Seronegative Mouse Patients
In a cohort study of Japanese MS patients, all EBV-seronegative cases carried the HLA-DRB1*04:05 gene variant, but the probability of observing this by chance was low, indicating a non-significant finding.
- Tags
- #MSResearch
- Most relevant to
- —
Why it matters
This observation raises questions about the potential role of HLA-DRB1*04:05 in EBV infection resistance among MS patients, highlighting areas for further research despite the small sample size.
What this does not prove
Due to the limited number of EBV-seronegative cases, these findings are only hypothesis-generating. They do not confirm any causal relationship between the genetic variant and EBV resistance.
Next milestone
No next milestone was established from the available source.
Study facts
- Study design
- Not reported
- Participants / samples
- Not reported
- Randomised
- Not reported
- Controlled
- Not reported
- Primary endpoint met
- Not reported
- Relevant MS type
- Not reported
- Publication date
- 2026-09-25
- Evidence reviewed
- Abstract only
- Regulatory approval
- Not reported
- Research areas
- Not classified
Original sources
- Primary evidenceHLA-DRB1*04:05 in Epstein-Barr virus-seronegative multiple sclerosis: a Japanese single-center study. ↗DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2026.107947
Supporting passages (4)
sample size basisMETHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 123 consecutive Japanese patients with MS who fulfilled the 2017 McDonald criteria and were negative for both anti-aquaporin-4 and anti-MOG antibodies.
findingsAll EBV-seronegative MS patients in this cohort carried HLA-DRB1*04:05.
limitationsBecause the number of seronegative cases is very small, this observation is hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory: it is compatible with, but does not establish, the possibility that DRB1*04:05 confers resistance to EBV infection or an attenuated humoral response to the virus.
publication datePublication date: 2026-09-25
AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.