Skip to content
Back to feed
AI CuratorAI-generated
Research summary ·
AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studyObservationalPublished in a peer-reviewed journal

Lymphopenia in Human Patients Treated with Fumarate-based Therapies

In a study of 274 MS patients, 32.8% developed grade ≥2 lymphopenia during treatment with fumarate-based therapies. The average absolute lymphocyte count dropped by 46% from baseline. Factors such as older age at treatment initiation and co-administration of dalfampridine were linked to higher rates of lymphopenia. Among those affected, 61% recovered their lymphocyte counts after treatment stopped, with an average recovery time of 22 months.

Most relevant to
—
This plain-English summary was written by AI from a published abstract and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.
Human efficacy
Not established from this source
Mechanism
Not reported
Evidence strength
Limited
Outcome
Positive

Why it matters

This research highlights the relatively high incidence of lymphopenia in patients treated with fumarates, exceeding previous estimates. Understanding these associations can inform monitoring practices during treatment.

What this does not prove

The findings stem from a retrospective chart review, which may be impacted by incomplete data or selection bias.

Next milestone

No next milestone was established from the available source.

Study facts
Study design
Observational
Participants / samples
274 · basis not reported
Randomised
Not reported
Controlled
Not reported
Primary endpoint met
Not reported
Relevant MS type
Not reported
Publication date
2026-10-27
Evidence reviewed
Abstract only
Regulatory approval
Not reported
Research areas
Not classified
Biological target
Not reported
Pathway
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Size of effect
Not reported
Secondary endpoints
Not reported
MRI endpoints
Not reported
Biomarkers
Not reported
Safety
Not reported

Original sources

Supporting passages (13)
study phaseLymphopenia is an expected side effect of fumarate-based multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies.
study designMETHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated incidence and severity of lymphopenia among 274 patients treated with fumarates and examined associations between fumarate-associated lymphopenia and clinical variables with univariate and multivariate analyses.
subjectsMETHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated incidence and severity of lymphopenia among 274 patients treated with fumarates and examined associations between fumarate-associated lymphopenia and clinical variables with univariate and multivariate analyses.
sample sizeMETHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated incidence and severity of lymphopenia among 274 patients treated with fumarates and examined associations between fumarate-associated lymphopenia and clinical variables with univariate and multivariate analyses.
peer reviewedJournal: Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
publication datePublication date: 2026-10-27
interventionPURPOSE: Lymphopenia is an expected side effect of fumarate-based multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies.
primary endpointMETHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated incidence and severity of lymphopenia among 274 patients treated with fumarates and examined associations between fumarate-associated lymphopenia and clinical variables with univariate and multivariate analyses.
follow upAmong those who developed grade ≥2 lymphopenia, ALC recovered to ≥1.0 K/mL in 61%, with average time of 22 months (SD 23) after treatment discontinuation.
findingsOlder age upon fumarate initiation was significantly associated with grade ≥2 lymphopenia (1.048 (95% CI=1.023, 1.074), p=0.0001).
outcomeIn this real-world clinical cohort, fumarate-associated lymphopenia incidence exceeds published estimates.
limitationsTitle: Fumarate-induced lymphopenia in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective analysis.
peer reviewedPublication types: Journal Article

AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.

0

Discussion 0 comments

Log in or join to comment.