AI CuratorAI-generated

Research summary · 5 d ago

AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studyInterventionalTrial registry record – peer review not applicable

Interventional Study in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study was planned with 15 participants diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis or Fibromyalgia, to compare active full-body stimulation against sham stimulation. The primary endpoint was the Berg Balance Scale. No results have been posted yet.

Tags: #MSResearch
Most relevant to: —
Source: Read original source

This plain-English summary was written by AI from a trial registry record and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.

Human efficacy: Not established from this source
Mechanism: Not reported
Evidence strength: No results yet
Outcome: Not reported

Why it matters

This research aims to evaluate the effects of stimulation on balance in individuals with MS, potentially informing future therapies. However, the lack of results means we can't determine if this intervention was effective.

What this does not prove

The study is still ongoing with no findings reported and endpoints not established. Therefore, its implications remain unknown.

Next milestone

No next milestone was established from the available source.

Study facts

Study design: Interventional
Participants / samples: 15 · planned enrolment
Randomised: Yes
Controlled: Yes
Primary endpoint met: Not reported
Relevant MS type: All
Publication date: Not reported
Evidence reviewed: Trial registry record
Regulatory approval: Not reported
Research areas: Not classified
Biological target: Not reported
Pathway: Not reported
Population: Individuals with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis or Fibromyalgia; ages from 18 Years to 75 Years
Size of effect: Not reported
Secondary endpoints: Not reported
MRI endpoints: Not reported
Biomarkers: Not reported
Safety: Not reported

Original sources

Trial registrationEvaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Full-Body Electrostimulation Garment for Individuals With Neurological and Neuromuscular Conditions That Cause Spasticity, Hyperreflexia, and Pain ↗

Supporting passages (15)

study phasePhase: Not applicable

study designStudy type: Interventional

subjectsParticipants: people; ages from 18 Years to 75 Years; sex All

sample sizeEnrollment: 15 participants (estimated)

randomizedAllocation: Randomized

controlledArm types: Experimental; Sham comparator

relevant ms typesConditions: Multiple Sclerosis; Fibromyalgia; Neurologic Disorder; Neuromuscular Disorders

primary endpointPrimary endpoints: Berg Balance Scale

populationhaving a definite diagnosis for at least one month\n 2.

findingsTrial registry record. Publication date: unknown. No results are posted. Planned enrolment and endpoints are not findings.

limitationsTrial registry record. Publication date: unknown. No results are posted. Planned enrolment and endpoints are not findings.

peer reviewedTrial registry record.

interventionInterventions: Active full-body stimulation; Sham full-body stimulation

follow upFollow-up: Baseline 1 (prior to Arm 1)- initial visit, Endpoint 1 (after Arm 1)- at ~2 weeks, Baseline 2 (after 2 week washout and before Arm 2)- at ~4 weeks, Endpoint 2 (after Arm 2)- at ~6 weeks, Follow-Up (2 weeks after Endpoint 2)- at ~8 weeks

sample size basisEnrollment: 15 participants (estimated)

AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 3 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.