Skip to content
Back to feed
AI CuratorAI-generated
Research summary ·
AI summary · not yet reviewedHuman studySystematic reviewPublished in a peer-reviewed journal

Human Subjects: Theory-Based Nursing Interventions for Multiple Sclerosis

A systematic review of nine randomized controlled trials found that theory-based nursing interventions were linked to significant improvements in quality of life, self-efficacy, daily living activities, and other health outcomes for individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Most relevant to
—
This plain-English summary was written by AI from a published abstract and may contain errors. It is not medical advice. Read the original study and talk to your MS team before making decisions about treatment.
Human efficacy
Demonstrated in people
Mechanism
Not reported
Evidence strength
Moderate
Outcome
Not reported

Why it matters

These findings suggest that structured nursing interventions can effectively support patients with multiple sclerosis, enhancing their overall health and well-being.

What this does not prove

The study limited its review to a small number of eligible RCTs, which may affect the generalizability of the results.

Next milestone

No next milestone was established from the available source.

Study facts
Study design
Systematic review
Participants / samples
9 · basis not reported
Randomised
Yes
Controlled
Yes
Primary endpoint met
Not reported
Relevant MS type
Not reported
Publication date
2026-10-11
Evidence reviewed
Abstract only
Regulatory approval
Not reported
Research areas
Not classified
Biological target
Not reported
Pathway
Not reported
Population
Not reported
Size of effect
Not reported
Secondary endpoints
Not reported
MRI endpoints
Not reported
Biomarkers
Not reported
Safety
Not reported

Original sources

Supporting passages (11)
study designThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-based nursing interventions for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS).
subjectsthe application of these theory-based nursing interventions were associated with statistically significant improvements across multiple outcomes, including quality of life, self-efficacy, activities of daily living, treatment adherence, hope, fatigue, stress regulation, lifestyle modification, and sleep quality.
sample sizeFollowing a rigorous screening process in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, nine studies meeting the predefined eligibility criteria were included in the review.
randomizedRESULTS: The included studies evaluated interventions grounded in nursing theories, including Orem's Self-Care Model (n = 3), the Continuous Care Model (n = 3), Pender's Health Promotion Model (n = 1), the Theory of Goal Attainment (n = 1), and the Collaborative Care Model (n = 1).
controlledThe findings indicate that the application of these theory-based nursing interventions were associated with statistically significant improvements across multiple outcomes, including quality of life, self-efficacy, activities of daily living, treatment adherence, hope, fatigue, stress regulation, lifestyle modification, and sleep quality.
peer reviewedMultiple sclerosis and related disorders
findingsThe findings indicate that the application of these theory-based nursing interventions were associated with statistically significant improvements across multiple outcomes, including quality of life, self-efficacy, activities of daily living, treatment adherence, hope, fatigue, stress regulation, lifestyle modification, and sleep quality.
human efficacyCONCLUSION: Theory-based nursing interventions not only yield significant positive effects on physical, psychological, and behavioral outcomes among individuals with multiple sclerosis but also serve as an essential framework for guiding the planning and delivery of holistic nursing care.
publication datePublication date: 2026-10-11
limitationsTitle: Examining the effectiveness of theory-based nursing interventions for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS): A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
peer reviewedPublication types: Journal Article; Review

AI assessment, not yet reviewed by a person · version 1 · Community votes are separate from evidence review.

0

Discussion 0 comments

Log in or join to comment.